![]() Such dynamics, on Beauvoir’s view, make authenticity in love impossible – but why? ![]() – theoretically have better chances of proceeding on an equal footing.īut nevertheless many cultural portrayals of love (from Puccini to pop) continue to depict it as a game between unequals – as conquest or domination, seduction or entrapment – where the boundaries are drawn along distinctly gendered lines. Although structural inequality persists, relationships between men and women – or men and men, or women and women, etc. Today’s women have greater access to education and employment than women did in 1949, and may be less likely to see love as life, as Beauvoir charged, instead of a part of life. But that is because she thought authentic love is so hard to achieve.įrom the vantage point of 2017, aspects of Beauvoir’s view of authentic love look rather dated and pessimistic: for one thing, it presents men and women in binary terms that are unlikely to resound with many readers. Simone de Beauvoir spent more time talking about inauthentic love than authentic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |